Two Stories That Caught My Eye!!

Everyone knows of my infatuation with Cleveland. You have heard me say many times, "Cleveland, the best location in the nation." I am more than proud of the fact that such notable characters as Bob Hope, Drew Carey, Halle Berry, Alan Freed (the original Rock & Roll disc jockey), Hector Boiardi (Chef Boy-ar-dee), Tim Conway, Wes Craven, Joel Gray, Arsenio Hall, Henry Mancini, Elliot Ness (the Untouchables), Jesse Owens, Debra Winger, George Stephanopolous (political advisor and pundit) and Don Shula all hail from the lakeside city.

Additionally, I marvel at the downtown improvement that has occurred since I was a child. The ugliness of pollution created by the steel mills is gone and the renaissance of a great city has occurred.

Now, I am flabbergasted by a legal confrontation that has thrust Cleveland into the limelight of judicial interpretation.

Bob Kitts is a contractor in the Cleveland area. Whether or not he is a good contractor is not for me to determine. I have never seen his work, but I can safely say that at this point in time I will certainly not hire him to hang a door, plaster a ceiling or replace a window. And, most definitely, I would never give him a chance to look behind my walls.

Kitts was recently gutting a bathroom in an 83-year old home that is owned by Amanda Reece, a former classmate of Kitts. In the process of tearing out a wall, Kitts came upon a box below the medicine cabinet. Inspection of the contents led to the discovery of some $25,000.

Giving Kitts the little bit of recognition that he deserves in this matter, he contacted Reece who came home and further investigation led to the finding of more than $100, 000 additional money in two other boxes. The value of the money was multiplied by the fact that it was depression-era Federal Resereve bank notes that proved to increase the value to about $500,000.

Ms. Reese generously, and perhaps ethically, offered Kitts the standard 10% finders fee. But, greed reared its ugly head and Kitts demanded 40% of the take. Feeling as though she was about to be the victim of a shakedown, Reese has dug in and it appears as though the case will head to court.

Kitts and his lawyer claim that Ohio has a long-standing precedent of "finders keepers" rulings that boost his chances of gaining more than the offered 10% finders fee. These rules kick in when its unlikely an owner will reappear to claim a lost item. The original owner of the money may have been Peter Dunn, the owner of the house during the depression. His whereabouts are unknown, but he has likely passed on.

But, my logic says that once Ms. Reese purchased the home, she became the rightful owner of whatever was in that house. Under those circumstances she has been fair in offering the 10% finders fee and I can only hope that the judicial interpretations will work in her favor. If not, we could all be victimized by our neighborhood handymen that might just find something hidden inside our walls.

+++++

Seldom do I dip into the sports world to write about, but I want to send out a real quick congratulations from me to George Mitchell and his report on the use of performance enhancing drugs by professional baseball players. His rather long (409 pages) and encompassing report, listed 88 former and present players that may have participated in the use of steroids and human growth hormones.

Certainly the most notable of these players is Barry Bonds, who has long been suspected of being a steroid user, and Roger Clemens.

Bonds has not been good for baseball, I don't care how many homeruns he slugged, the records he broke or the denials he has long made about steroid use. He is arrogant and snotty. He has long demonstrated the attitude that the rules don't apply to him.

The sad part about his participation in the use of illegal substances is that he took what was a certain Hall of Fame career and turned it into a baseball sideshow.

Clemens has been a dominant pitcher in baseball for the past 20+ years. His exploits in Boston and New York are monumental in baseball history. However, in recent years his comeback efforts, his special treatment demands (not having to come to the ballpark if he's not pitching) and his numerous injuries have detracted from the record he established for himself during the prime of his career. Now a connection to illegal substance use drops him down even further on the ladder of respectablity.

Ironically, both Bonds and Clemens could be just five years away from election to the Baseball Hall of Fame. And most certainly they will be scrutinized like no other player has been. The test of deservability might not be their accomplisments which were established in the early stages of their careers. Their right to belong to the elite of baseball might be based on what they did at the end of their career. And in my mind, I hope to see them standing on the outside of the fence along with Pete Rose as they watch lesser-talented but more reputable people earning their way into the annals of sports history.